Sabah can also slash our debt like Penang!

October 31, 2011

In just the short span of 2 years plus after being elected the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) government of Penang have been able to reverse the damage done by 50 years of corruption by the previous government. The same has happened to the Selangor and Kedah states which are also ruled by PR.

How did this miraculous transformation come about despite the interference by a hostile Federal government? It was done by the hard work of fighting corruption, getting the trust of the people, good planning and good governance and most importantly, Transparency.

I say Sabah and Sarawak with our natural resources have a better chance to improve and develop, therefore lifting our people out of poverty.

But first we must be a change of government whereby the current UMNO/BN crop of corrupted leaders must be sacked in the coming 13th General Election. Then and only then can the real work of developing the Sabah and Sarawak states (and not forgetting the other peninsular states) can begin.

Save Sabah, Save Sarawak, Save Malaysia.

Guan Eng slashes Penang’s debt by 95% to RM30mil from RM630mil

Written by  Sherina Yusof, Malaysia Chronicle

Guan Eng slashes Penang's debt by 95% to RM30mil from RM630mil

                                                                         Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said his administration has managed to cut the level of debt owed by the state by 95% from RM630 million to RM30 million.

According to him, the huge drop was a sign of the success by the Pakatan Rakyat state government in managing the Penang economy since taking over from the Barisan Nasional following the 2008 general election.

“The people don’t have to worry about how much money their state owes due to past practices that were questionable,” Guan Eng said during a speech over the weekend at Tasek Gelugor.

“Due to thriftiness and good management, we have been able to pay back the loans to Bank Negara. In the past, debts accumulated due to bad practises that were not transparent and were corrupt in nature.”

Disciplined budget

According to Guan Eng, during the past 3 years, his administration had enforced strict discipline to stay within its Budget, and this yielded good results, enabling him to chalk a surplus that could be returned to the people and to further develop the state.

The past administration under Gerakan president Koh Tsu Koon had run a deficit budget, and this culture of spending had led to state councils such as the Majilis Perbandaran Seberang Perai or MPSP almost going bankrupt.

Guan Eng also pointed out that the federal government now owes RM456 billion for development expenditure including those by its agencies. This underscored not only rampant corruption but also a ‘wrong’ and dangerous culture of spending money that is not there, but based on borrowings, he said.

This works out to be RM16,300 of debt per person in the population, the chief minister added.

“This is why the people should not feel too happy and believe the BN when it gives RM500 to each household that earns less than RM3,000 in the recent Budget 2012. What is RM500 when waiting ahead is RM16,300 of debt per person if the BN government fails to honor its obligations,” said Guan Eng, who is also the DAP secretary-general.

Indeed Pakatan states have all done well. Kedah has come in from credit from the Auditor-General in his recently released 2010 report. Earlier this month, Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim announced the state had chalked its highest cash reserves in 28 years!

Malaysia Chronicle


Prevent Our EPF savings from becoming a huge Ponzi Scheme!

October 30, 2011

I read with disgust the latest scheme by the ruling UMNO to enrich themselves, their bini (wives) and cronies, by plundering our hard earned (and hard taxed) EPF savings.

These people are using RM 55Billion of our EPF money to bail out failed and mismanaged companies and the money given are without collateral. So, what will happen to us and our EPF money when the bail outs fail again! We will be left with the smelly, short end of the stick.

If we wanted to withdraw even RM1.00 from EPF we have to fill in multiple forms and blacken our thumbs multiple times on the multiple forms. AND (Sic…) these well connected companies and people gets away with Billions of our money with no counter-checks as to the money’s use and if they will pay it back. If the money are lost or misused will the companies directors and the people in charge (the people up there!) be investigated by MACC? I don’t think so as they OWN the MACC and the courts!

Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from any actual profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The system is destined to collapse because the earnings, if any, are less than the payments to investors. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Below I put the article that caused me much nausea and vomiting disgust…

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/179870

EPF loaned RM55bil without gov’t guarantee backing

Aidila Razak
1:43PM Oct 28, 2011

The Employees Provident Fund (EPF) approved loans worth an astounding RM55.1 billion not backed by government guarantees.

However, the Auditor-General’s Report 2010 found only one of the 13 debtors was qualified to obtain a loan without such a guarantee. That particular debtor was extended credit worth RM21.3 billion.

NONEOf the remaining 12 debtors, Khazanah Nasional Bhd and Tenaga Nasional Bhd were exempted from producing government guarantees as they had high credit ratings.

The loans to the two parties totalled RM7.3 billion.

The report also revealed that the EPF had also given out 15 loans worth a total of RM35.69 billion as of the Dec 31, 2010.

Of the 15 loans given, two were made to non-government entities despite having government guarantees. The loans are worth RM5 billion and RM1.24 billion respectively.

EPF in its response said one of the debtors is an incorporated body of the Finance Ministry, while a government agency has a 66 percent stake in the second debtor company.

The EPF Act 1991 allows it to extend credit to the federal and state governments, as well as to companies incorporated under the Companies Act 1965, or set up with the Finance Ministry’s  written permission.

The report said that as of the end of 2010, EPF had given out a total RM95.79 billion, earning RM2.52 billion in interest payments for the year.

RM4 bil loan skipped procedure

The year before, EPF was found to have not followed procedure for the approval of a loan worth RM4 billion for a government housing loan scheme.

azlanThe application was not tabled at the investment management committee meeting, before being approved on July 3, 2009.

“EPF said this was because the investment proposal was presented directly to the investment panel as an urgent decision was required,” it read.

The audit nevertheless found that EPF was “satisfactory” in its investment and loan activities, and had acted in accordance with Section 26 of the EPF Act.

“However, it should ensure that all department operation manuals for investment and loans are finalised and implemented.

“EPF must also ensure that all loan applications are tabled in the investment management committee meetings before it is passed by the (investment) panel,” it advised.


Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth — Written by Ismail Dahlan, Malaysia Chronicle

October 25, 2011

Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth 

Written by  Ismail Dahlan, Malaysia Chronicle

Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth

It was Euripides in ‘Medea’ who made famous the phrase “ Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad”. Certainly it would be a fitting description of Muammar Gaddafi, whose gory end was telecast for all to see, on Al-Jazeera and CNN. It would be no less appropriate a phrase to describe Mahathir Mohammed; who has been mad for quite a while now.

We will not delve too much into what drove Mahathir mad, but it does not appear to be the usual reasons of genetics, or grief, or some drug overdose. Mahathir appears to have been driven mad by power. And perhaps certifiably insane by his quest for absolute, unquestioned power.

A crackpot in many ways

In the mid-80s, Malaysia still retained some independent institutions. However when the judiciary, in the form of Salleh Abbas, refused to bow to Mahathir’s dictates, he took drastic steps to destroy Salleh Abbas. And henceforth the judiciary became Mahathir’s creature, rather than a proudly independent institution in the British tradition. He would also go on to clip the powers of Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy. Mahathir became, for all intents and purposes, Malaysia’s dictator. He was surrounded by sycophants and rent-seekers. And that appeared to be exactly how Mahathir liked it, for megalomaniacs are certain they know best, and view the givers of dissenting advice as threats.

Mahathir, uncaring of the fact that Malaysia was a small country with limited say in the affairs of the world, would proceed to attempt to lecture everyone else, particularly the West, on how the world, or their nations,  should be run.  This despite the fact that he ran Malaysia like a demented despot.

There are two ways that countries can play large roles in the global affairs of nations. They must have either financial or military muscle. Malaysia had neither, yet Mahathir would for years, including after he retired, continue to harangue the west with his ‘advice’. In the case of 9/11, to this day he insists that it was an American or Jewish conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers. This crackpot conspiracy theorist, to the detriment of his country, was Malaysia’s Prime Minister for 22 years.

Then there was Proton

Three years after becoming Prime Minister, in 1983, Mahathir  would decide to create, from scratch, a national automotive industry. This, of course, was, to put it mildly, a really bad idea. Automotive industries require captive home markets. You can only break even, assuming a competitive environment, if you could sell a million cars a year in your home market. Proton, a decade after its formation, could only manage to sell 200 thousand units a year, far short of the required million. There could never be money for genuine R&D. Proton would never meet Mahathir’s fantastical dream of being a world player in the automotive market. Proton only continued to survived on the protection of government tariffs. And it’s cars were merely repackaged Mistsubishis using outdated technology; as Mitsubishi was not willing to share new technology with Proton.

Ordinary Malaysians ended up with the raw end of the deal; they were forced to buy Proton’s sub-standard cars for premium prices. Consumer safety was ignored by Proton and the government turned a blind eye. Protons lacked airbags and and anti-lock braking mechanisms. Many a fatality occurred that could have been prevented  if these saferty features had been in place. Export models of course had all the requisite safety features. It was only Malaysian lives that Mahathir deemed cheap. The government tried to rid itself of Proton by selling it to DRB but Proton would come boomeranging back to haunt it. And no real automotive company was interested to buy it. Discussions with Volkswagon and GM would all fall apart. Malaysia is stuck with Proton, thanks to Mahathir, and it is costing us.

Asian Financial Crisis took a heavy toll

Not that Mahathir was bothered by his failures. Like a mad scientist, he would go off on his next experiment. In one case it was to build the tallest building in the world. Money was not an issue; he could expropriate it from Petronas under one guise or the other.None of his advisers appeared to have asked the most obvious question, which would be; why on earth would you want to do that? Instead they appeared to tell him, in toadying chorus, what a wonderful idea it was.

There were endless other ways to spend the money, in development or infrastructure, that would have benefited Malaysia in the long term. Mahathir instead chose to dump it in a concrete monument to his own vanity. Mahathir was the short guy, trying to walk on outsize stilts to prove that he was tall. It was unreal and  was bound to end in a big fall, which is precisely what would happen in the Asian meltdown of 1997/98 when Mahathir’s house of cards would come crashing down on him.

Malaysia’s apparent success in the 1990s was at first attributed to good economic management. Yet all the Asian economies were booming including Thailand and Indonesia. It was quite impossible that Asian leaders, including a collection of despots whose leading lights were Suharto and Mahathir, were all providing their nations with good economic leadership.

The real explanation was that foreign funds were fuelling the Asian boom and too much of it was hot money that could disappear overnight. The fact that more and more funds were investing in Asia was an indication of the herd instinct that rules the often illogical global financial markets; rather than anything else. Currency speculators would take advantage of the inherent weaknesses of the economies within this unsustainable system to usher in, starting with Thailand, the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997.

Rushed to blame others

For Mahathir, it would mean a political crisis as well. His way of handling the Financial Crisis was to blame everybody except, of course, himself. George Soros, a currency trader, was suddenly a monstrous leech feeding off helpless Asian countries. Yet currency traders were a part of the complex global financial system. If there was an imbalance in the system, the currency traders would, in their own way, correct it. Mahathir would not admit that he had been spending money on failed grandiose schemes. It was all, Mahathir insisted, Soros’s fault.

The Malaysian political crisis of 1998 would test Mahathir as never before, and it would illustrate the lengths that Mahathir would go to hang on to power. His deputy Anwar Ibrahim would be jailed, based on concocted evidence fabricated, allegedly, at the behest of Mahathir’s friend and crony, Daim Zainuddin. The trial was a farce; one of the key prosecution witnesses, a policeman, stating that he would lie to the court if ordered to do so and yet managing to have his evidence admitted.

Putrajaya

In 1999 Mahathir would move his administrative capital to Putrajaya, a fantasy city built from scratch at enormous cost. As usual, Mahathir had Petronas pay for it. For Mahathir, oil was not a finite resource for Malaysia as a nation to carefully manage, but a means to realize his own grandiose  visions, often with no particular benefit to the country.

Putrajaya would cost an irreplaceble RM 12 billion to Malaysia. The money went into grand designs and buildings filled with expensive furniture. It went into expensive ornate lamp posts instead of functional ones. Wanting to have bridges, but not having either rivers or lakes in Putrajaya, Mahathir dug his own lakes! He then built bridges over the ground he had just dug up! All this at taxpayer cost!

And what did we have to show for it? A bunch of civil servants sitting in nice buildings instead of functional ones. Nice buildings do not produce any economic activity. Factories do, private business does, and  infrastructure facilitates the two, reducing the cost of goods and services and reducing time to market. Putrajaya’s buildings and unneccessary just sit there; a huge crater of waste.

Handover to Badawi

In 2004, Mahathir handed over power to Abdullah Baddawi. He was certain that he would be able to control Baddawi from behind the scenes. Baddawi, however, decided to go his own way. He cancelled projects that Mahathir had approved. He would not build Mahathir’s lunatic ‘crooked bridge’ to Singapore. Mahathir then engaged in a ‘war’ with Baddawi which would end with Baddawi’s ouster after the 2008 elections; though Baddawi was forced to leave office more because of BN’s 2008 election debacle rather than Mahathir’s attacks.

Over the past 2 years Mahathir has been trying to rewrite history by claiming, for example, that he had not ordered the the infamous 1987 Ops Lalang where more than a hundred opposition figures were arrested. Nobody was fooled and his audience actually laughed.

Not satisfied, Mahathir wrote a book with the misleading title of ‘Doctor in the House’. The book is filled with hypocrisies and in some instances, outright lies. His intention, one supposes, was to try and make himself look like a doctor who cured Malaysia’s ills. In fact, Mahathir was a cancer in Malaysia’s gut, and his malignant effect will be felt long after he is gone.

Malaysia Chronicle


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers