STAR- The Best For Sabah’s Rights.

April 29, 2013

Dr Felix Chong Joins STAR. 11Feb2012.

“STAR Sabah is a clear-cut choice to champion the cause of Sabah’s rights and interests. Peninsular parties cannot go all out to champion Sabah’s rights and interests,” responded Dr. Felix Chong of STAR Sabah.

“After going through the party’s causes and aspirations for Sabah, I took up the challenge and joined STAR Sabah to continue my political struggle for Sabah’s rights and interests. I fully support the Borneo Agenda and the restoration of the rights and autonomy for Sabah,” added Dr. Felix.

He declared that he not alone and the majority of the committee members of DAP Tg. Aru have followed him and joined STAR Sabah. It is up to the leadership of DAP Sabah to determine the fate of DAP Tg. Aru.

Sabah is not the equivalent of any State in Semenanjung and the agenda of Peninsular parties is not necessarily applicable to Sabah.

“My advice to DAP is not to be too arrogant in looking down on Sabahans. If they are sincere in helping restore Sabah’s rights and interests, elaborate political programs and ceramahs are insufficient without an elaborate objective for Sabah and Sabahans with real action and political will to implement them,” he said.

Dr. Felix Chong berkata bahawa parti STAR Sabah ada lah pilihan yang tepat untuk memperjuangkan hak dan kepentingan rakyat Sabah.
Parti yang berpusat di Semenanjung tidak mampu menuntut semua hak dan kepentingan rakyat Sabah, kata nya.
Tambah Dr. Felix, setelah mengkaji perjuangan parti STAR, beliau memutuskan untuk mengambil cabaran dengan menyertai STAR Sabah demi untuk meneruskan lagi perjuangan politik beliau dalam menuntut hak dan kepentingan Sabah.

  • Beliau tertarik dan menyokong penuh Agenda Borneo dalam missi untuk mengembalikan hak-hak dan autonomi bagi negeri Sabah.
  • Untuk tujuan itu, beliau menyatakan bahawa beliau bukan bersendirian, mala majoriti ahli jawatankuasa DAP Tg. Aru bersama beliau menyertai STAR Sabah. Terpulang kepada kepimpinan DAP Sabah untuk menentukan nasib DAP Tg. Aru, kata beliau.
  • Sabah tidak sama dengan mana-mana Negeri di Semenanjung, justeru agenda di Semenanjung tidak semestinya boleh digunapakai di Sabah, kata Dr Felix.

Dalam pada itu, beliau menasihatkan ahli-ahli DAP agar jangan terlalu angkuh dengan memperkecil-kecilkan kebolehan rakyat Sabah.
Jika perjuangan mereka ikhlas membantu mengembalikan hak dan kepentingan rakyat Sabah, mereka seharus nya huraikan dengan lebih telus, program-program yang boleh membantu rakyat Sabah.
Bukan hanya sekadar turun padang memberi ceramah yang kurang jelas hala-tuju nya untuk rakyat Sabah, kata beliau.


Umno ‘medicine’ killing Sabah.

May 10, 2012

KOTA KINABALU: The State Reform Party (Star) is no longer amused by “the gross exaggerations and inaccuracies” continually being peddled by the ruling Umno-led Barisan Nasional (BN) in Sabah in the run-up to the forthcoming 13th General Election.

The latest statement from Umno which has irked the Borneo-based national party is one from Chief Minister Musa Aman. The Sabah leader claimed on Tues that the opposition, unlike BN, cannot offer the right medicine for Sabah. He claimed “numerous achievements” in the state under the BN.

“If the Peninsular Malaysia-based Umno and BN have the right formula for Sabah, why was the state singled out by the World Bank at the end of 2010 as the poorest state in Malaysia?” asked Star vice chairman Dr Felix Chong in a press statement. “Umno and BN should stop telling tall tales to the people.”

Star’s premise, according to Chong, is that the cure for Sabah’s mounting economic woes lies in reversing Putrajaya’s internal colonization policies in the state.

“Money, or rather the lack of it, is at the root of Sabah’s poverty,” said Chong. “Putrajaya is taking away all our money just like what the British did during the colonial days. That’s why Sabah is poor.”

As an example, he cited Petronas and the Federal Government siphoning away 95 per cent of the oil and gas revenue from the inner waters, 100 per cent from the outer outers and almost all other revenue.

Other revenue alone collected last year by the Federal Government in Sabah amounted to nearly RM 40 billion, he added. “Also, the Peninsular Malaysia-owned gaming companies in Sabah and Sarawak are taking away billions every year.”

“In return, of this year’s National Budget of nearly RM 200 billion, Sabah and Sarawak have been allocated only RM 4 billion each,” pointed out Chong. “We don’t know how much of the RM 4 billion has been released to Sabah.”

He queried why the Federal Government is funding the development of Malaya (Peninsular Malaysia) at the expense of the people of Sabah and Sarawak, the latter the 2nd poorest state in Malaysia according to the World Bank.

He queried the media including the alternative media in Peninsular Malaysia often blocking the local opposition’s right of reply to the numerous statements from the government side. This gives the impression, said Chong, that the local opposition is unable to rebut the government’s statements.

The Peninsular Malaysia-based parties operating in Sabah and Sarawak, continued Chong, were not about helping the people of the two states. They are here to steal our states in the respective state assemblies and Parliament so that they can get their hands on our Budget for their own self-serving ends, he claimed. “They want to use our Budget to get contracts for themselves to hand out to Peninsular Malaysia-based companies.”

The bottomline, stressed Chong, is that Sabah and Sarawak need to have a greater say in Parliament through local parties.

He called for “as a first cure” the restoration of the balance of power in Parliament with Peninsular Malaysia having at the most one seat less than two-thirds while Sabah/Sarawak at the very minimum have one seat more than one-third of the seats. This was provided for under the 1963 Malaysia Agreement, said Chong, “which has been observed by the Federal Government more often than not in the breach.”

“Restoring the balance in Parliament coupled with Peninsular Malaysia-based parties staying out of Sabah and Sarawak will be the right medicine to help us overcome our grinding poverty, ignorance and disease,” said Chong.

The Chief Minister of Sabah, vowed Chong, must also be appointed by the people of Sabah, the state assembly and the Governor in accordance with the state constitution.

Earlier, Musa in his statement at a Wanita BN gathering advised the people not be influenced or confused by the opposition’s propaganda barrage.

He was particularly scathing in his criticisms of the Democratic Action Party (Dap), which reportedly has bright prospects in Chinese seats in Sabah, and the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) which is aligned to it in Pakatan Rakyat (PR) along with Pas.

The Sabah Progressive Party (Sapp), a mosquito local party which broke away from the Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) in 1994, has since agreed to support PR under a PR Plus arrangement.

Star has expressed willingness to debate both local parties and Peninsular Malaysia-based parties, across both sides of the political divide, on all issues but so far only the Dap has responded and only grudgingly it has been reported.


PETRONAS GAIN IS SABAHANS LOSS!

March 6, 2012

The latest Petronas Financial Results for the 9-months
period ending 31 Dec, 2011 that was just announced.
The Gross Profits for the 9-months increased to RM82.687 billion
compared to RM69.746 billion for the corresponding period ending 31
Dec. 2011.
It is to be noted that although the gross profits increased, it was
after deductions of hefty increases in administration expenses from
RM5.668 billion to RM10.663 billion and other expenses from RM1.714
billion to RM4.050 billion.
For the financial year ending 31 March 2010, Petronas made a gross
profit of RM82.4 billion and RM90.5 billion for the financial year
ending 31 March 2011.
At this rate, Petronas will probably make a record gross profit of
more than RM110 billion for the full year ending 31 March 2012.
Based on the 2011 State Budget, Petronas is expected to receive about
RM13.721 billion for Sabah’s oil and gas and Sabah will receive only
RM721.7 million being 5% cash payment.

THIS IS BLATANT DAYLIGHT ROBBERY…IMAGINE WHAT WE CAN DO TO DEVELOP OUR POOR SABAH WITH RM 13 BILLION, INSTEAD OF THE MONEY BEING USED TO DEVELOP AN ALREADY WELL-DEVELOPED MALAYA…

PETRONAS-Third Quarter Ended 31 December 2011


TRUE STORY OF A PRIME MINISTER!

February 17, 2012

- WRITTEN BY ANONYMOUS.

This man had not, however, been elected into the premiership, and consequently never earned his own governing mandate. He had succeeded into the job when his predecessor was forced to resign under internal pressure. While the coup was not entirely of his own orchestration, this prime minister had played an important albeit implicit role in facilitating it.

His predecessor is an altogether different story. Initially elected with much fanfare by a buoyant nation on a platform of hope and change after years of rule by an authoritarian and right-of-centre leadership, his premiership had by its tail-end been reduced to a lethargic disappointment.

Though heavily criticised and the subject of mass ridicule, he was still able to pull through with a mediocre win at the general election. Remaining defiant, he announced that he would fulfil the mandate of the people and see through his term as prime minister.

However, his own party members had other plans. Disenchanted with his leadership, the internal politicking began. New pacts were formed, loyalties shifted and deals were cut. Attention now turned to our protagonist, the then-deputy prime minister, a man long known for his loyalty and methodical methods.

Convinced that the gamble would pay off, he began to make his moves. Though his actions were not overt, the die was cast and the message was clear. In the end, faced with open revolt and under immense pressure, the incumbent prime minister had no choice but to announce that he would step aside within a year. Even that was too long and before the year was up, his premiership had crumbled to an abrupt end.

Expectations were high for the new prime minister. In an elaborate campaign to both distinguish himself from his predecessor and spruce up his public image, he took on the mantle of a statesman with vision for leadership and change.

This led to a popularity high and favourable approval ratings. Soon, the opportunity for snap polls presented itself. With the benefits of a honeymoon period still lingering, it would have been the perfect time to call it. Yet an indecisive itch overcame him and he decided against it at the last minute. Instead, he thought it best to wait for a better opportunity.

In hindsight, that was perhaps his biggest mistake.

As days went by, the public began to realise that a man who has been a part of the system for so long is really incapable of change. His promises of a better future began to ring hollow amidst growing economic uncertainty.

The longer he was into his administration, the more problems unravelled. Financial irregularities and scandals involving his party members made dimmer and dimmer the prospect of a desirable moment for a general election.

Yet the prime minister kept waiting and waiting, until by the time he knew it, his government’s term of office was up. In the end, what was supposed to have been snap polls that would have leveraged upon his then-popularity and caught his opponents by surprise had become an exercise that was easily predicted by all and sundry.

Having rigorously prepared for so long, the hungry opposition wasted no time in pouncing aggressively. Without the element of surprise, the prime minister had lost the upper hand and soon found himself on the defensive. Election Day came and the nation delivered its result. Though not very conclusive, it was certainly very clear about one thing: the people had rejected the prime minister.

After a short period of denial and desperate attempts at forming a coalition, the prime minister had little choice but to accept his fate. Indecisiveness, poor decision-making and the inability to carry out necessary reforms are traits that will characterise his legacy as a short-lived prime minister who had never won his own mandate.

–This is the story of the former British prime minister, Gordon Brown.

 Who did you think the article was talking about???


Rubbish Rubbish everywhere but BN YBs are blind!!

January 31, 2012

Tg Aru Rubbish- Rubbish on the shore & under houses

Tg Aru waterfront needed through clean up.
A visit conducted by the Sabah DAP Tanjong Aru Branch chairman cum the Sabah DAP State Health and Medical Advisory Bureau Chief, Dr. Felix Chong Kat Fah to the water village in Tanjong Aru Lama and Baru, found that the environment is really dirty and it is the most complained by the residents here.

They said they themselves have to clear the rubbish, mostly plastic bags and bottles themselves every day after work. If the rubbish was not cleared and burnt off, the whole kampong will be filled with this underneath their house and the shore line. They said the smell is very foul especially when the hot sun is shining. The rubbish can be very unhygienic too, because sometime they can see worms and rats among the rubbish.

Dr. Felix Chong saw them burning the plastic rubbish and told them not to do so, because the black fume emitted is poisonous and can cause health problems. He said this is the job of the DBKK and the government to come regularly to clear the piles of rubbish accumulated on the shore and underneath the houses. This people have been living there for generations and it is their right to have a better environment to live in. The older people here said, this Tanjong Aru kampong is used to have beautiful and clean beaches, but now it is all gone. The government and the YBs are blind or just don’t care about them anymore.

Datuk Edward Yong Oui Fah, the THREE term ADUN said Tg. Aru is clean now, may be he didn’t come to visit this part of the town which is under his constituency. This was confirmed by the kampong folks here, when they met Dr. Felix.

-Dr. Felix Chong Kat Fah


How many UMNO ministers does it take to change a lightbulb?

November 3, 2011

How many UMNO ministers does it take to change a lightbulb?

NONE.

As first they have to form a study group commitee (or NKRA Lab), make a report by a private consultant, direct award to a crony company, pay RM1 Million for the lightbulb, but the lightbulb still not changed.

Eventually when asked why is the Lightbulb still NOT changed while the money (RM1 Million) has already been paid, the Minister in charge of  Lightbulbs has NO Ideas and gives No explanation, passes the buck and claims that he/she actually saved the govt. RM10.00 while spending RM1 Million???


Sabah can also slash our debt like Penang!

October 31, 2011

In just the short span of 2 years plus after being elected the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) government of Penang have been able to reverse the damage done by 50 years of corruption by the previous government. The same has happened to the Selangor and Kedah states which are also ruled by PR.

How did this miraculous transformation come about despite the interference by a hostile Federal government? It was done by the hard work of fighting corruption, getting the trust of the people, good planning and good governance and most importantly, Transparency.

I say Sabah and Sarawak with our natural resources have a better chance to improve and develop, therefore lifting our people out of poverty.

But first we must be a change of government whereby the current UMNO/BN crop of corrupted leaders must be sacked in the coming 13th General Election. Then and only then can the real work of developing the Sabah and Sarawak states (and not forgetting the other peninsular states) can begin.

Save Sabah, Save Sarawak, Save Malaysia.

Guan Eng slashes Penang’s debt by 95% to RM30mil from RM630mil

Written by  Sherina Yusof, Malaysia Chronicle

Guan Eng slashes Penang's debt by 95% to RM30mil from RM630mil

                                                                         Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said his administration has managed to cut the level of debt owed by the state by 95% from RM630 million to RM30 million.

According to him, the huge drop was a sign of the success by the Pakatan Rakyat state government in managing the Penang economy since taking over from the Barisan Nasional following the 2008 general election.

“The people don’t have to worry about how much money their state owes due to past practices that were questionable,” Guan Eng said during a speech over the weekend at Tasek Gelugor.

“Due to thriftiness and good management, we have been able to pay back the loans to Bank Negara. In the past, debts accumulated due to bad practises that were not transparent and were corrupt in nature.”

Disciplined budget

According to Guan Eng, during the past 3 years, his administration had enforced strict discipline to stay within its Budget, and this yielded good results, enabling him to chalk a surplus that could be returned to the people and to further develop the state.

The past administration under Gerakan president Koh Tsu Koon had run a deficit budget, and this culture of spending had led to state councils such as the Majilis Perbandaran Seberang Perai or MPSP almost going bankrupt.

Guan Eng also pointed out that the federal government now owes RM456 billion for development expenditure including those by its agencies. This underscored not only rampant corruption but also a ‘wrong’ and dangerous culture of spending money that is not there, but based on borrowings, he said.

This works out to be RM16,300 of debt per person in the population, the chief minister added.

“This is why the people should not feel too happy and believe the BN when it gives RM500 to each household that earns less than RM3,000 in the recent Budget 2012. What is RM500 when waiting ahead is RM16,300 of debt per person if the BN government fails to honor its obligations,” said Guan Eng, who is also the DAP secretary-general.

Indeed Pakatan states have all done well. Kedah has come in from credit from the Auditor-General in his recently released 2010 report. Earlier this month, Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim announced the state had chalked its highest cash reserves in 28 years!

Malaysia Chronicle


Prevent Our EPF savings from becoming a huge Ponzi Scheme!

October 30, 2011

I read with disgust the latest scheme by the ruling UMNO to enrich themselves, their bini (wives) and cronies, by plundering our hard earned (and hard taxed) EPF savings.

These people are using RM 55Billion of our EPF money to bail out failed and mismanaged companies and the money given are without collateral. So, what will happen to us and our EPF money when the bail outs fail again! We will be left with the smelly, short end of the stick.

If we wanted to withdraw even RM1.00 from EPF we have to fill in multiple forms and blacken our thumbs multiple times on the multiple forms. AND (Sic…) these well connected companies and people gets away with Billions of our money with no counter-checks as to the money’s use and if they will pay it back. If the money are lost or misused will the companies directors and the people in charge (the people up there!) be investigated by MACC? I don’t think so as they OWN the MACC and the courts!

Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from any actual profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The system is destined to collapse because the earnings, if any, are less than the payments to investors. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Below I put the article that caused me much nausea and vomiting disgust…

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/179870

EPF loaned RM55bil without gov’t guarantee backing

Aidila Razak
1:43PM Oct 28, 2011

The Employees Provident Fund (EPF) approved loans worth an astounding RM55.1 billion not backed by government guarantees.

However, the Auditor-General’s Report 2010 found only one of the 13 debtors was qualified to obtain a loan without such a guarantee. That particular debtor was extended credit worth RM21.3 billion.

NONEOf the remaining 12 debtors, Khazanah Nasional Bhd and Tenaga Nasional Bhd were exempted from producing government guarantees as they had high credit ratings.

The loans to the two parties totalled RM7.3 billion.

The report also revealed that the EPF had also given out 15 loans worth a total of RM35.69 billion as of the Dec 31, 2010.

Of the 15 loans given, two were made to non-government entities despite having government guarantees. The loans are worth RM5 billion and RM1.24 billion respectively.

EPF in its response said one of the debtors is an incorporated body of the Finance Ministry, while a government agency has a 66 percent stake in the second debtor company.

The EPF Act 1991 allows it to extend credit to the federal and state governments, as well as to companies incorporated under the Companies Act 1965, or set up with the Finance Ministry’s  written permission.

The report said that as of the end of 2010, EPF had given out a total RM95.79 billion, earning RM2.52 billion in interest payments for the year.

RM4 bil loan skipped procedure

The year before, EPF was found to have not followed procedure for the approval of a loan worth RM4 billion for a government housing loan scheme.

azlanThe application was not tabled at the investment management committee meeting, before being approved on July 3, 2009.

“EPF said this was because the investment proposal was presented directly to the investment panel as an urgent decision was required,” it read.

The audit nevertheless found that EPF was “satisfactory” in its investment and loan activities, and had acted in accordance with Section 26 of the EPF Act.

“However, it should ensure that all department operation manuals for investment and loans are finalised and implemented.

“EPF must also ensure that all loan applications are tabled in the investment management committee meetings before it is passed by the (investment) panel,” it advised.


Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth — Written by Ismail Dahlan, Malaysia Chronicle

October 25, 2011

Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth 

Written by  Ismail Dahlan, Malaysia Chronicle

Has Dr Mahathir gone mad? The truth about the man and nothing but the truth

It was Euripides in ‘Medea’ who made famous the phrase “ Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad”. Certainly it would be a fitting description of Muammar Gaddafi, whose gory end was telecast for all to see, on Al-Jazeera and CNN. It would be no less appropriate a phrase to describe Mahathir Mohammed; who has been mad for quite a while now.

We will not delve too much into what drove Mahathir mad, but it does not appear to be the usual reasons of genetics, or grief, or some drug overdose. Mahathir appears to have been driven mad by power. And perhaps certifiably insane by his quest for absolute, unquestioned power.

A crackpot in many ways

In the mid-80s, Malaysia still retained some independent institutions. However when the judiciary, in the form of Salleh Abbas, refused to bow to Mahathir’s dictates, he took drastic steps to destroy Salleh Abbas. And henceforth the judiciary became Mahathir’s creature, rather than a proudly independent institution in the British tradition. He would also go on to clip the powers of Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy. Mahathir became, for all intents and purposes, Malaysia’s dictator. He was surrounded by sycophants and rent-seekers. And that appeared to be exactly how Mahathir liked it, for megalomaniacs are certain they know best, and view the givers of dissenting advice as threats.

Mahathir, uncaring of the fact that Malaysia was a small country with limited say in the affairs of the world, would proceed to attempt to lecture everyone else, particularly the West, on how the world, or their nations,  should be run.  This despite the fact that he ran Malaysia like a demented despot.

There are two ways that countries can play large roles in the global affairs of nations. They must have either financial or military muscle. Malaysia had neither, yet Mahathir would for years, including after he retired, continue to harangue the west with his ‘advice’. In the case of 9/11, to this day he insists that it was an American or Jewish conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers. This crackpot conspiracy theorist, to the detriment of his country, was Malaysia’s Prime Minister for 22 years.

Then there was Proton

Three years after becoming Prime Minister, in 1983, Mahathir  would decide to create, from scratch, a national automotive industry. This, of course, was, to put it mildly, a really bad idea. Automotive industries require captive home markets. You can only break even, assuming a competitive environment, if you could sell a million cars a year in your home market. Proton, a decade after its formation, could only manage to sell 200 thousand units a year, far short of the required million. There could never be money for genuine R&D. Proton would never meet Mahathir’s fantastical dream of being a world player in the automotive market. Proton only continued to survived on the protection of government tariffs. And it’s cars were merely repackaged Mistsubishis using outdated technology; as Mitsubishi was not willing to share new technology with Proton.

Ordinary Malaysians ended up with the raw end of the deal; they were forced to buy Proton’s sub-standard cars for premium prices. Consumer safety was ignored by Proton and the government turned a blind eye. Protons lacked airbags and and anti-lock braking mechanisms. Many a fatality occurred that could have been prevented  if these saferty features had been in place. Export models of course had all the requisite safety features. It was only Malaysian lives that Mahathir deemed cheap. The government tried to rid itself of Proton by selling it to DRB but Proton would come boomeranging back to haunt it. And no real automotive company was interested to buy it. Discussions with Volkswagon and GM would all fall apart. Malaysia is stuck with Proton, thanks to Mahathir, and it is costing us.

Asian Financial Crisis took a heavy toll

Not that Mahathir was bothered by his failures. Like a mad scientist, he would go off on his next experiment. In one case it was to build the tallest building in the world. Money was not an issue; he could expropriate it from Petronas under one guise or the other.None of his advisers appeared to have asked the most obvious question, which would be; why on earth would you want to do that? Instead they appeared to tell him, in toadying chorus, what a wonderful idea it was.

There were endless other ways to spend the money, in development or infrastructure, that would have benefited Malaysia in the long term. Mahathir instead chose to dump it in a concrete monument to his own vanity. Mahathir was the short guy, trying to walk on outsize stilts to prove that he was tall. It was unreal and  was bound to end in a big fall, which is precisely what would happen in the Asian meltdown of 1997/98 when Mahathir’s house of cards would come crashing down on him.

Malaysia’s apparent success in the 1990s was at first attributed to good economic management. Yet all the Asian economies were booming including Thailand and Indonesia. It was quite impossible that Asian leaders, including a collection of despots whose leading lights were Suharto and Mahathir, were all providing their nations with good economic leadership.

The real explanation was that foreign funds were fuelling the Asian boom and too much of it was hot money that could disappear overnight. The fact that more and more funds were investing in Asia was an indication of the herd instinct that rules the often illogical global financial markets; rather than anything else. Currency speculators would take advantage of the inherent weaknesses of the economies within this unsustainable system to usher in, starting with Thailand, the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997.

Rushed to blame others

For Mahathir, it would mean a political crisis as well. His way of handling the Financial Crisis was to blame everybody except, of course, himself. George Soros, a currency trader, was suddenly a monstrous leech feeding off helpless Asian countries. Yet currency traders were a part of the complex global financial system. If there was an imbalance in the system, the currency traders would, in their own way, correct it. Mahathir would not admit that he had been spending money on failed grandiose schemes. It was all, Mahathir insisted, Soros’s fault.

The Malaysian political crisis of 1998 would test Mahathir as never before, and it would illustrate the lengths that Mahathir would go to hang on to power. His deputy Anwar Ibrahim would be jailed, based on concocted evidence fabricated, allegedly, at the behest of Mahathir’s friend and crony, Daim Zainuddin. The trial was a farce; one of the key prosecution witnesses, a policeman, stating that he would lie to the court if ordered to do so and yet managing to have his evidence admitted.

Putrajaya

In 1999 Mahathir would move his administrative capital to Putrajaya, a fantasy city built from scratch at enormous cost. As usual, Mahathir had Petronas pay for it. For Mahathir, oil was not a finite resource for Malaysia as a nation to carefully manage, but a means to realize his own grandiose  visions, often with no particular benefit to the country.

Putrajaya would cost an irreplaceble RM 12 billion to Malaysia. The money went into grand designs and buildings filled with expensive furniture. It went into expensive ornate lamp posts instead of functional ones. Wanting to have bridges, but not having either rivers or lakes in Putrajaya, Mahathir dug his own lakes! He then built bridges over the ground he had just dug up! All this at taxpayer cost!

And what did we have to show for it? A bunch of civil servants sitting in nice buildings instead of functional ones. Nice buildings do not produce any economic activity. Factories do, private business does, and  infrastructure facilitates the two, reducing the cost of goods and services and reducing time to market. Putrajaya’s buildings and unneccessary just sit there; a huge crater of waste.

Handover to Badawi

In 2004, Mahathir handed over power to Abdullah Baddawi. He was certain that he would be able to control Baddawi from behind the scenes. Baddawi, however, decided to go his own way. He cancelled projects that Mahathir had approved. He would not build Mahathir’s lunatic ‘crooked bridge’ to Singapore. Mahathir then engaged in a ‘war’ with Baddawi which would end with Baddawi’s ouster after the 2008 elections; though Baddawi was forced to leave office more because of BN’s 2008 election debacle rather than Mahathir’s attacks.

Over the past 2 years Mahathir has been trying to rewrite history by claiming, for example, that he had not ordered the the infamous 1987 Ops Lalang where more than a hundred opposition figures were arrested. Nobody was fooled and his audience actually laughed.

Not satisfied, Mahathir wrote a book with the misleading title of ‘Doctor in the House’. The book is filled with hypocrisies and in some instances, outright lies. His intention, one supposes, was to try and make himself look like a doctor who cured Malaysia’s ills. In fact, Mahathir was a cancer in Malaysia’s gut, and his malignant effect will be felt long after he is gone.

Malaysia Chronicle


WikiLeaks: RCI on Sabah illegals unlikely due to Dr M-era politicians !

September 6, 2011

Posted by Dr M-era politicians !!!! PROJECT-M OR IC on September 03, 2011 at 11:19:55: WikiLeaks: RCI on Sabah illegals unlikely due to Dr M-era politicians !
Written by Malaysia Chronicle
A confidential US embassy cable puts little hope in the possibility of a Royal Commission of Inquiry into Sabah’s illegal immigrant problem, blaming it on the vested interests of “Mahathir-era politicians” in the state.
The cable, posted online by Wikileaks, alleged that the federal government and Umno had actively facilitated the issuance of Malaysian documents to illegal immigrants in exchange for political support.
The cable went on to claim that a retired senior intelligence official “frankly admitted” that former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamed’s administration had “facilitated illegal immigration” from neighbouring Indonesia and the Philippines to “better balance the state’s ethnic and religious equation”.
The retired official allegedly said that this was a preventive measure to “ward off any future separatist sentiments in Sabah, in addition to attracting Umno votes needed to control the state”.
“A Royal Commission, operated properly, would likely expose the depth of Umno and BN’s political corruption and vote manipulation, further inciting Sabahans,” stated the cable, dated Sept 5, 2008.
Sabah politicians and activists have long been demanding that the federal government fulfil its responsibilities in helping solve this long-standing issue, with many claiming that it started to get out of hand during the 1994 state elections when the then opposition PBS was toppled by the BN after a nine-year rule.
Among the demands put forward was for a RCI to be formed to probe the root causes of the state’s burgeoning illegal immigrant problem.
The latest call came from Upko president and Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok, following the purported installation of a Sabah businessman as the Sultan of Sulu.
Crackdown on illegals ‘political band aid’
This was, however, not the first time Dompok had demanded a RCI, with the cable stating that he had told US embassy officials back in 2008 that the Royal Commission is needed to find out who are issuing Malaysian documents to illegal immigrants for any action to be effective.
Describing the periodic operations against the illegal migrants in Sabah as “political band aid”, the cable pointed out that Sabahans “see the immigrants being deported as ‘low hanging fruit’, enabling authorities to demonstrate that they are ‘doing something’ about it”.
The cable also quoted the then Suhakam vice-chairperson Simon Sipaun, who cited estimates of around 1.9 million illegals and/or undocumented people living in Sabah, far higher than the federal government’s official estimates of 240,000.
Another person quoted in the cable, Muhammad Radzi Jamaludin who was principal assistant secretary in the Foreign Affairs Ministry’s Southeast Asia division, allegedly conceded to US embassy officials that many Filipinos deported from Sabah returned after just “a couple weeks”.
He added that some Malaysian women falsely claim Filipino citizenship, only to announce they are Malaysians upon reaching the Philippines and that they wanted to stay with their husbands, who were being deported.
Govt accused of ‘selective crackdown’
The cable concluded that the federal government crackdowns on illegal immigrants in Sabah have been “selective” and “explicitly avoids raids on key areas of migrant employment” such as manufacturing, logging, palm oil plantations and service industries, “which could be forced to curtail operations without their illegal migrant workers”.
A local journalist met by US embassy officials allegedly told them that an earlier damping down “that proved too effective” in detaining illegal immigrants after local business leaders complained and the police official who planned the operation was punished and transferred.
“Sabahans consider illegal immigration a major concern, even though important segments of the state’s economy are highly dependent on cheap migrant labour.
“Many view illegal immigrants, especially Filipino Muslims, as upsetting the political balance in Sabah, whose native majority is Catholic.
“The lack of enthusiasm among Sabahans for current illegal immigrant crackdown illustrates the overall mistrust of the BN government and its peninsular-centric policies,” the cable said.

- Malaysia Kini


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers